<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Net-Usage on fplanque.com [EN]</title>
    <link>https://www.fplanque.com/categories/net-usage/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Net-Usage on fplanque.com [EN]</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.134.3</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2022 01:58:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.fplanque.com/categories/net-usage/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>2013 and still no usable WiFi hotspots</title>
      <link>https://www.fplanque.com/work/mobile-wireless/still-no-usable-wifi-hotspots/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2013 16:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.fplanque.com/work/mobile-wireless/still-no-usable-wifi-hotspots/</guid>
      <description>I travelled from Paris to Amsterdam this week... (for a business conference).
I took the Thalys speed train. They offer WiFi on board... supposedly via satellite with fallback to multilink 3G when necessary. The reality is it works only 50% of the time&amp;amp;hellip;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IM sucks... (and so does email)</title>
      <link>https://www.fplanque.com/work/productivity/im-sucks-and-so-does-email/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2005 19:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.fplanque.com/work/productivity/im-sucks-and-so-does-email/</guid>
      <description>Over the last 6 months I have refrained as much as possible from using Instant Messaging, if it was not for scheduled conversations. I mean, IM is cool in a &amp;#34;netmeeting&amp;#34; kind of way. But having an IRC/MSN/Yahoo/ICQ/Whatever Messenger open all day,&amp;amp;hellip;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Video conferencing: future is now!</title>
      <link>https://www.fplanque.com/work/net-usage/video-conferencing-future-is-now/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2004 23:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.fplanque.com/work/net-usage/video-conferencing-future-is-now/</guid>
      <description>Okay now, sometimes I really feel stuck in south of France when I need to be working with people in Paris! Phone &#43; email was cool until my phone bills rocketed in the past few months... :-/ Recently, I decided, with a couple of business partners, to&amp;amp;hellip;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>URGENT BUSINESS PROPOSAL blah blah blah...</title>
      <link>https://www.fplanque.com/work/net-usage/urgent-business-proposal-blah-blah-blah/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2003 01:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.fplanque.com/work/net-usage/urgent-business-proposal-blah-blah-blah/</guid>
      <description>Ever wondered how it comes you now receive at least five of these urgent requests for assistance a day? Check it all out at this pretty complete site: http://www.scamorama.com/ Make sure you read at least one of those hilarious stories where the&amp;amp;hellip;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Unsubscribring from spam *STILL NOT* ;)</title>
      <link>https://www.fplanque.com/work/net-usage/unsubscribring-from-spam-still-not/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2003 00:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.fplanque.com/work/net-usage/unsubscribring-from-spam-still-not/</guid>
      <description>Following up on wether or not to unsubscribe from spam, Cédric [site gone] adds some clarifications: I am talking about the particular case of a spam email that defeated my filters and ended up in my Inbox. This is the one I want to get rid of. I don&amp;#39;t&amp;amp;hellip;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Unsubscribring from spam *NOT*</title>
      <link>https://www.fplanque.com/work/net-usage/unsubscribring-from-spam-not/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2003 02:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.fplanque.com/work/net-usage/unsubscribring-from-spam-not/</guid>
      <description>Cédric posted some interesting thoughts about whether or not to unsubscribe from spam.
Cédric advocates that unsubscribing has become less a trap than it used to be, basically because spammers are better off collecting new masses of addresses than&amp;amp;hellip;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Google &amp; BlogNoise: the blogger&#39;s responsiblity</title>
      <link>https://www.fplanque.com/work/blog-media/google-blognoise-blogger-responsibility/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2003 20:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.fplanque.com/work/blog-media/google-blognoise-blogger-responsibility/</guid>
      <description>We have talked about the annoying BlogNoise problem before. And most bloggers have agreed that Google would probably be smart enough to fix the problem shortly in order to provide a better service to their users. A great part of the BlogNoise is&amp;amp;hellip;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Trendspotting: mobile SPAM :(</title>
      <link>https://www.fplanque.com/work/mobile-wireless/trendspotting-mobile-spam/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2003 18:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.fplanque.com/work/mobile-wireless/trendspotting-mobile-spam/</guid>
      <description>It&amp;#39;s already making me sick... and it&amp;#39;s only the beginning :( Mobile SPAM is coming in all flavours! First there is SMS spam. Your phone beeps in the middle of a meeting as if you just received an alert, you check what&amp;#39;s going wrong... but no, it&amp;#39;s just&amp;amp;hellip;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Google &amp; BlogNoise: a semantic approach</title>
      <link>https://www.fplanque.com/work/blog-media/google-blognoise-a-semantic-approach/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2003 11:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.fplanque.com/work/blog-media/google-blognoise-a-semantic-approach/</guid>
      <description>As Russel points out (original article gone), the quality of searches is dwindling at Google as the result of BlogNoise. It seems to me that Google could easily cut out a lot of blogcrap of their search results if they performed their searches on a post&amp;amp;hellip;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Syndirella 0.9a rocks!</title>
      <link>https://www.fplanque.com/tech/syndication/syndirella-0-9a-rocks/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Jan 2003 00:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.fplanque.com/tech/syndication/syndirella-0-9a-rocks/</guid>
      <description>Two days ago Dmitry Jemerov aka yole released Syndirella a pretty cool GNU GPL news agregator with a lot of interesting features like being able to agregate blogs which don&amp;#39;t provide any RSS feed! Looked like FeedReader had just gotten better!!&amp;amp;hellip;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
